SEBI Uncovers Bizarre Case That Raises Questions on Registration Oversight
In a case that has stunned both regulators and market participants, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has cancelled the registration of a so-called research analyst who, in reality, was operating a small grocery shop and had no involvement in securities market research. The individual, identified as Purooskhan, was found to be running a modest 100-square-feet provision store in Madurai, selling daily essentials and snacks instead of providing investment analysis or advisory services.
The unusual discovery prompted SEBI’s quasi-judicial authority to question how such a person could have obtained registration as a Research Analyst in the first place, exposing potential gaps in verification and monitoring mechanisms.
Quasi-Judicial Authority Expresses Surprise at the Findings
The order, passed by SEBI’s quasi-judicial authority Santosh Kumar Shukla, makes for striking reading. During a virtual hearing, the regulator observed that the registrant appeared unfamiliar with even basic securities market concepts.
“During the hearing through virtual mode, it appeared that the Noticee is not conversant with securities market activities and he runs a small provision store selling daily essentials, snacks, etc. It could not be reasonably gauged as to how such a person was having registration as a Research Analyst,” Shukla noted in the order.
Purooskhan himself admitted to SEBI that he was running a small business and was not engaged in any research analyst activity. Based on these findings, the regulator concluded that the registration served no legitimate market purpose and cancelled it with immediate effect.
Also Read : Why Silver Is Beating Gold And Seven Trends Investors Need To Watch In 2026
Complaint on ‘Sure-Shot’ Calls Triggered the Probe
The case traces its origin to a complaint filed in June 2022 on SEBI’s SCORES platform against a website named www.optionresearch.in. The website promised “sure-shot” trading calls, claimed zero risk, and assured investors of doubling their capital—classic red flags in the eyes of regulators.
According to the complaint:
-
The investor paid Rs 50,000 in fees to the website
-
He availed paid trading services based on the recommendations
-
He eventually suffered losses of nearly Rs 4 lakh
These allegations prompted SEBI to initiate a detailed examination of the website and the individuals associated with it.
SEBI Finds Registration Number Used to Lend Credibility
During its probe, SEBI found that the Option Research Company (ORC) website projected itself as a SEBI-certified entity and prominently displayed Purooskhan’s Research Analyst registration number. The website offered multiple paid investment advisory packages, raising serious concerns about investor protection and regulatory misuse.
In its show-cause notice, SEBI alleged that:
-
ORC was allowed to use Purooskhan’s registration details
-
His email ID and password had allegedly been shared
-
The registration was used to lend legitimacy to unregulated activities
SEBI noted that regardless of intent, allowing registration details to be used in such a manner undermines regulatory safeguards and investor trust.
Purooskhan Claims Identity Misuse and Files Police Complaints
In his defence, Purooskhan claimed that his registration number was misused without his knowledge. He told SEBI that he had no association with the website and had filed police complaints against Option Research Consultancy.
He submitted:
-
A complaint lodged with the Tamil Nadu Police on September 27, 2022
-
A cybercrime complaint filed on October 11, 2022 under online financial fraud
Purooskhan alleged that one G Faheeth Ali, a partner at ORC, had approached him posing as a bank employee and claimed there was a vacancy for a research analyst. Under this pretext, photocopies of certificates and personal details were allegedly obtained and later misused.
Regulator Notes Inconsistencies in the Defence
SEBI, however, observed inconsistencies in the sequence of events. After the regulator initiated scrutiny, ORC reportedly issued an appointment letter to Purooskhan, naming him as compliance officer and authorising him to issue trading calls—an offer he claimed to have declined.
The regulator took a dim view of the fact that a registered individual appeared unaware of how his credentials were being used, noting that registration comes with a responsibility to safeguard access and prevent misuse.
Earlier Leniency Gives Way to Tougher Action
Interestingly, this was not the first regulatory action in the matter. In an earlier proceeding, the adjudicating officer had given Purooskhan the benefit of doubt and closed the case without imposing a monetary penalty.
Separately, in August last year, SEBI passed another order directing:
-
Refund of Rs 30.39 lakh to investors
-
A two-year market ban on related entities
-
Monetary penalties of Rs 6 lakh each on those involved
This time, however, SEBI chose to revoke Purooskhan’s registration entirely, effectively ending what many market participants have termed the “grocery store research analyst” episode.
Broader Message for Investors and Market Participants
The case serves as a cautionary tale for investors who rely blindly on claims of SEBI registration and guaranteed returns. It also sends a clear signal that the regulator is willing to revisit past decisions and take corrective action when facts demand it.
As one market expert remarked, “Registration is not just a certificate—it carries accountability. This order reinforces that responsibility cannot be outsourced or ignored.”
