Gig Work Under the Scanner as Delivery Pay Sparks a National Debate Zomato and Swiggy
On December 31, one of the busiest nights of the year for food delivery and quick-commerce platforms, delivery partners across India called for coordinated protests to press long-standing demands around pay, incentives and social security. While operations largely continued uninterrupted, the strike calls reignited a broader debate around how much gig workers on platforms like Zomato and Swiggy actually earn — and whether the model offers sustainable income over time.
At the heart of the discussion is a paradox. Delivery work today often offers competitive cash earnings at the entry level, particularly in large cities. Yet earnings growth depends almost entirely on longer hours and higher order volumes, with limited scope for upward mobility within the system.
What Delivery Partners Earn in Practice
Data from staffing firm TeamLease Services suggests that a full-time delivery partner in a metro city can earn a gross monthly income of ₹20,000 to ₹30,000, depending on location, hours worked and incentives.
Balasubramanian A, Senior Vice President at TeamLease Services, explained, “On average, a full-time delivery partner in a metro city earns a gross monthly income of ₹20,000 to ₹30,000, and in some cases even more. The wages are a function of the platform, locality, hours worked and incentives earned.”
Platform disclosures broadly align with this view. According to data shared by Deepinder Goyal, delivery partners who log in for 8–10 hours a day, 26 days a month, typically gross ₹26,500–27,700. After accounting for fuel and vehicle maintenance costs — roughly 20% — net monthly earnings work out to about ₹21,000.
Also Read : Network18 And CNN International Recommit For 10 Years With Plans To Scale Global Reach
How Delivery Pay Is Structured on the Ground
While headline monthly numbers draw attention, daily earnings depend on a tightly structured payout model. Conversations with delivery partners reveal that income is built on two core layers:
-
Base pay per order, typically ₹20–50 for deliveries within a fixed radius
-
Incentives, linked to hitting daily order targets such as 10, 20 or 25 deliveries
For longer distances, riders earn an additional ₹8–10 per kilometre beyond the base range. Peak-hour slots — usually between 7 pm and 10 pm — carry the highest incentives, pushing riders to stay logged in during these windows.
A Delhi-based delivery partner said, “You can reject one or two orders, but if you keep doing it, the app just stops sending work. You don’t really choose orders — the system chooses for you.”
Incentives Drive Income, but Also Volatility
Incentives form a significant share of daily earnings and can sharply boost income on busy days. Under normal conditions, workers report:
-
₹40–50 per order for quick-commerce deliveries
-
₹50–70 per order for food delivery
During high-demand periods, payouts can spike dramatically. On New Year’s Eve, for instance, Zomato reportedly offered ₹120–150 per order during peak hours.
A Swiggy delivery partner explained the pressure this creates: “The system pushes you to stay logged in longer and chase the next slab. If you stop short, your earnings for the day fall quickly.”
The result is a model where income is less about individual order pay and more about time spent online, peak-hour availability and hitting incentive thresholds — a structure that can lift earnings on busy days but makes them uneven overall.
How Delivery Pay Compares With Formal Jobs
In comparison, TeamLease data shows that entry-level take-home pay in sectors like retail typically ranges between ₹15,000 and ₹20,000, while freshers in BFSI roles earn around ₹18,000–22,000. On the surface, delivery work compares favourably.
However, the difference lies in progression. Formal jobs usually offer increments, promotions and role expansion over time. Delivery earnings, by contrast, tend to plateau once utilisation peaks, with little scope for structural wage growth beyond working more hours.
Platform Data Shows Limited Full-Time Participation
Platform data also highlights that most delivery partners do not work full-time. On Zomato, the average partner logged in for just 38 days in the year. Only 2.3% worked more than 250 days annually, underlining the flexible, supplementary nature of gig participation for most workers.
Goyal noted, “Most delivery partners work for a few hours and only a few days in a month. Demanding full-time employee benefits like PF or guaranteed salaries doesn’t align with what the model is built for.”
Scale of the Workforce Adds to the Tension
The debate is amplified by the sheer size of the workforce involved. In the September quarter, Zomato’s parent Eternal reported nearly 8.94 lakh monthly active delivery partners across food delivery and quick commerce. Swiggy disclosed about 6.91 lakh average monthly transacting partners. Together, the two platforms engage over 15 lakh delivery workers each month.
For many workers, frustration stems from falling base pay. Several partners said base payouts that once stood at ₹40–45 per order have, on some routes, dropped to ₹15–20, making incentives essential just to reach earlier income levels.
“Earlier, even without chasing incentives, the base itself made the day workable,” said one rider. “Now, if you miss slabs, earnings drop very fast.”
A Model at a Crossroads
Platforms argue that incentive-led pricing helps balance supply and demand while preserving flexibility for part-time workers. Delivery partners counter that it has made earnings less predictable and increased dependence on peak hours.
While recent strike calls failed to disrupt operations, they have sharpened scrutiny on whether the current pay model can evolve as gig work shifts from side income to long-term livelihood for a growing segment of India’s workforce. For investors, the debate underscores a key risk: balancing unit economics with worker sustainability in a sector built on scale.
