India’s Tariff Set at 27%, Not 26%: White House Annex Reveals Adjustments for Some Countries

India’s Tariff Set at 27%, Not 26% White House Annex Reveals
India’s Tariff Set at 27%, Not 26% White House Annex Reveals
7 Min Read

White House Document Reveals Revised Reciprocal Tariff Rates

A recent annex released by the White House has revealed slight upward adjustments to the reciprocal tariff rates for multiple countries, including India. According to the newly published data, India’s reciprocal tariff rate has been set at 27 percent—one percentage point higher than the 26 percent previously stated. This minor but significant revision aligns with a broader pattern observed in at least 14 other economies, where tariff rates were similarly increased by exactly one percentage point.

The discrepancy was first noted by Bloomberg after reviewing published figures. When President Donald Trump initially announced his “Liberation Day” tariffs in the Rose Garden, the figures presented included slightly lower tariff rates for several nations. The latest revision, as reflected in the official annex, now lists updated tariffs that are marginally higher than initially indicated.

Highlights:

  • India’s reciprocal tariff rate has been adjusted from 26% to 27%.

  • At least 14 other countries saw their tariff rates increase by 1 percentage point.

  • The revisions were reflected in the official annex but not in the original White House announcement.

Global Tariff Policy: Understanding the April 5 Implementation

Under the executive order implementing Trump’s new reciprocal tariff policy, all US trading partners will be subjected to a global baseline tariff of 10 percent, starting April 5. However, certain countries—including India—will see their tariff rates increase beyond this initial level. Four days after the global baseline goes into effect, the countries listed in the White House annex will have their rates elevated to the specific percentages outlined in that document.

South Korea, for instance, was initially set to face a 25 percent tariff but will now be subjected to a 26 percent levy. Other nations with revised rates include Pakistan, Thailand, Norway, Cameroon, and several smaller economies. While the changes appear minor, they could have significant economic and trade implications, particularly for export-dependent industries in the affected nations.

Highlights:

  • The global 10% tariff applies to all trading partners starting April 5.

  • Countries listed in the annex will see higher tariffs beginning April 9.

  • South Korea, Pakistan, Thailand, and others also saw upward revisions in tariff rates.

Lack of White House Explanation for Tariff Adjustments

Despite the noticeable discrepancies between the original tariff charts and the revised annex, White House officials have not provided any clarification regarding the adjustments. Bloomberg reported that multiple requests for comment placed overnight went unanswered, leaving the reasons behind the changes open to speculation.

While the increases are relatively small, the fact that they apply to a broad group of nations suggests a deliberate policy adjustment rather than a clerical error. Some analysts believe the modifications could be linked to last-minute trade negotiations or internal recalibrations of the administration’s broader tariff strategy.

Observations:

  • The White House has not responded to inquiries regarding the tariff revisions.

  • The adjustments appear intentional and not accidental.

  • Analysts speculate that last-minute policy recalibrations could be the reason behind the changes.

Overseas Territories and Possessions Missing from Tariff Annex

Another notable discrepancy in the White House’s updated tariff documentation is the absence of certain overseas territories and possessions. In the original tariff charts released alongside Trump’s announcement, some dependent territories were assigned distinct tariff rates separate from their parent nations. However, these territories are now missing from the annex, raising questions about whether they will be subjected to reciprocal tariffs at all.

For example, Reunion, a French overseas territory located in the Indian Ocean, was initially listed with a steep 37 percent tariff rate. However, it does not appear in the formal annex, suggesting it may not be subjected to the tariff policy. Similarly, Saint Pierre and Miquelon—a French archipelago near Canada—and Norfolk Island, an Australian territory, were also omitted from the updated document.

This omission creates uncertainty for businesses and trade partners operating in these territories. If they are indeed exempt from the tariffs, it could create loopholes that companies might exploit to bypass the higher levies imposed on their parent nations.

Notable Developments:

  • Certain overseas territories previously listed with high tariffs are now missing from the annex.

  • Reunion (France), Saint Pierre and Miquelon, and Norfolk Island are among those omitted.

  • The omission raises questions about potential tariff exemptions or policy inconsistencies.

Implications for Global Trade and Future Policy Moves

The latest revisions to the White House’s tariff policy underscore the fluid nature of US trade strategy under the Trump administration. The unexpected increase in reciprocal tariff rates for certain nations, coupled with the omission of specific territories, suggests that further adjustments could still be on the horizon.

For India, the increase from 26 percent to 27 percent is unlikely to change the fundamental impact of the tariffs, but it does highlight the unpredictable nature of ongoing trade relations. With the first phase of the policy set to take effect on April 5, followed by additional rate hikes for listed countries on April 9, the coming weeks will be crucial for businesses navigating these new trade restrictions.

Broader Market Insights:

  • The evolving tariff strategy suggests potential for further adjustments in the near future.

  • India’s slightly higher tariff rate reinforces concerns about escalating trade barriers.

  • The omission of some territories may create potential loopholes in enforcement.

Share This Article
Follow:

Sourabh loves writing about finance and market news. He has a good understanding of IPOs and enjoys covering the latest updates from the stock market. His goal is to share useful and easy-to-read news that helps readers stay informed.

Go to Top
Join our WhatsApp channel
Subscribe to our YouTube channel