Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles (TMPV) began the week on a weak note, with the stock falling as much as 6% on Monday after the company reported a disappointing Q2 FY26 performance. The decline was primarily driven by Jaguar Land Rover’s sharp deterioration in profitability, a steep cut in its full-year margin guidance, and the operational setback caused by the recent cyberattack.
At market open, Tata Motors PV shares were trading at ₹369, down 5.7% from Friday’s close of ₹391.2. Analysts said the correction reflects concerns over the depth of JLR’s disruption, the scale of the EBITDA loss, and a divided view on the company’s near-term recovery path. This was also the first quarterly result of Tata Motors PV as a standalone entity, coming at a time of muted global demand for premium vehicles.
Also Read: Fox News Host Calls H-1B Visa System a ‘Cheap Labour Pipeline’; Says 70% Holders Are Indian
The quarter turned sharply weaker due to the steep decline in JLR’s performance.
Jaguar Land Rover cut its full-year EBIT margin guidance to 0–2% from 5–7%, and warned of a GBP 2.2–2.5 billion free cash outflow for FY26.
JLR reported:
GBP 485 million loss before tax and exceptional items
24.3% YoY revenue decline to GBP 24.9 billion
Negative margins as the cyber incident halted production in September
The cyberattack had a significant operational impact, worsening an already challenging quarter.
For the passenger vehicles business:
Adjusted for the CV demerger one-time gain, the PV division would have reported a ₹6,370-crore loss, compared to a ₹3,056-crore profit last year
Standalone TMPV posted an adjusted loss of ₹237 crore
Revenue rose 6% to ₹12,751 crore
EBITDA fell sharply to ₹303 crore from ₹717 crore
Margins shrank to 2.4%
The steep drop in EBITDA and margins highlighted the pressure on operating performance across the PV and JLR segments.
Top brokerages offered mixed reactions, with concerns largely centered around JLR’s performance and the impact of the cyberattack.
Jefferies believes the cyberattack will continue to affect Q3, with normalisation expected only in Q4. It flagged structural challenges at JLR including:
Intensifying competition
China’s consumption tax
Higher discounting
BEV transition pressures
An ageing model line-up
It added that India’s PV resilience is “not enough to offset JLR weakness.”
Goldman Sachs stated that Q2 performance suffered due to a larger-than-estimated disruption at JLR, with revenue beating estimates but EBITDA missing sharply (+2% / -130% vs. forecast).
JLR now expects 30,000 units of lost production in Q3, higher than the 20,000 units lost in Q2.
CLSA noted the JLR margin setback, with EBIT margin at –8.6% vs –2% expected, driven by the complete production halt in September. It highlighted:
October production at 17,000 units
India PV EBITDA margin at 5.8%
The firm remains constructive on the India PV business, citing benefits from GST cuts for small-to-mid SUVs, though it acknowledged JLR’s significantly lower FY26 margin guidance.
Click here to explore:
Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles Ltd
Shares of Yes Bank and Union Bank of India gained up to 3% on December…
DGCA Steps In With Temporary Rule Relaxation as IndiGo Flight Cancellations Deepen Across India In…
Petronet LNG’s stock saw a sharp upmove on December 4, rising more than 4 percent…
The domestic equity market staged a sharp recovery on Friday as the Sensex surged over…
India’s financial markets have entered a phase defined by conflicting forces, as the Reserve Bank…
The momentum in public sector bank (PSU bank) stocks took a noticeable pause this week…
This website uses cookies.