When the new tax regime was introduced, the assumption was clear. Remove deductions, and people will gradually move away from traditional savings schemes. Reality turned out more complicated.
Small savings collections have climbed to around ₹2.17 lakh crore this fiscal year. That’s not a small number. It’s a sign that households are not rushing to change long-standing habits, even when tax incentives shift.
Tax Rules Changed, But Behaviour Didn’t
On paper, the new tax regime makes many classic savings-linked deductions irrelevant. In theory, that should reduce the appeal of PPF, NSC, Sukanya Samriddhi, and similar schemes. But money decisions rarely follow theory.
People stick to what they understand. These schemes are familiar, simple, and backed by the government. For many savers, that reassurance matters more than a marginal tax benefit.
Rates Still Matter More Than Narratives
Small savings interest rates have been revised upward over the past year, keeping them competitive with bank fixed deposits. For retirees, conservative investors, and households planning long-term goals, predictable returns still beat market-linked uncertainty.
Markets go up, markets go down. Small savings just keep ticking.
That stability is hard to replace.
Risk Aversion Is Back in Fashion
Global headlines haven’t helped risk appetite. High global bond yields, currency volatility, and geopolitical noise have made investors cautious again. In such periods, guaranteed products quietly regain popularity.
You can see it in flows. People may talk about equities, but a large chunk of household money still prefers certainty.
The New Regime Is Still a Transition Story
Another reality is that many taxpayers haven’t fully shifted to the new tax regime. Some remain on the old system. Others are experimenting but not changing their savings behaviour. Financial habits evolve slowly, especially when tied to retirement planning or children’s education.
Policy can change overnight. Household behaviour usually doesn’t.
What This Means for Policymakers
For the government, strong inflows into small savings schemes are useful. These funds help finance borrowing needs and social spending without excessive reliance on market borrowing.
But it also raises a broader issue. If the goal is to deepen market participation, tax tweaks alone won’t be enough. Trust, awareness, and financial education will matter just as much.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. What are small savings schemes in India?
Small savings schemes are government-backed investment options such as Public Provident Fund (PPF), National Savings Certificate (NSC), Sukanya Samriddhi Yojana, Senior Citizens Savings Scheme (SCSS), and Post Office deposits. They offer fixed returns and sovereign security.
2. Why did small savings inflows reach ₹2.17 lakh crore?
Inflows stayed strong because investors still prefer safety, predictable returns, and government backing, especially amid market volatility and global economic uncertainty.
3. Did the new tax regime reduce demand for small savings schemes?
Not significantly. While the new tax regime removed deductions linked to savings, many households continued investing due to habit, risk aversion, and competitive interest rates.
4. Are small savings interest rates still attractive?
Yes. Rates on several small savings instruments have been revised upward and remain competitive with bank fixed deposits, which keeps them appealing to conservative investors.
5. Who mainly invests in small savings schemes?
Middle-income households, retirees, and long-term planners dominate small savings investments. These groups prioritize capital protection over higher but uncertain market returns.
6. Will small savings inflows remain strong in the future?
Flows may stay steady as long as interest rates remain competitive and market volatility persists. However, gradual financial market adoption could shift some money toward equities and mutual funds over time.
