{"id":26897,"date":"2026-05-29T17:09:33","date_gmt":"2026-05-29T11:39:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/trending.niftytrader.in\/?p=26897"},"modified":"2026-05-29T17:15:10","modified_gmt":"2026-05-29T11:45:10","slug":"fake-rs-500-notes-record-61-percent-rbi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.niftytrader.in\/markets\/fake-rs-500-notes-record-61-percent-rbi\/","title":{"rendered":"Fake Rs 500 Notes Hit Record 61.8% of All Counterfeits: RBI"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"meta-row\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"lead\">India&#8217;s banking system detected 2,29,746 fake notes in FY2025-26\u2014up 5.7% from 2,17,396 in FY25, with fake Rs 500 notes jumping 20.5% to 1,41,907 pieces, their highest-ever share of total counterfeits at 61.8%, according to the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rbi.org.in\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Reserve Bank of India&#8217;s<\/a> annual report released Friday, May 29, 2026.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div class=\"stat-grid\">\n<div class=\"stat-card\">\n<div class=\"stat-label\">\n<table style=\"height: 160px;\" width=\"724\">\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Metric<\/th>\n<th>FY26 Data<\/th>\n<th>Trend<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Total fake notes detected<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>2,29,746<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>\u2191 5.7% vs FY25<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Fake \u20b9500 notes<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>1,41,907<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>\u2191 20.5% vs FY25<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>\u20b9500 share of total fake notes<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>61.8%<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>Up from 54.2% in FY25<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Fake \u20b92,000 notes<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>824<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>\u2193 76.5% vs FY25<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"section-head\">Key findings at a glance<\/h2>\n<ul class=\"bullet-list\">\n<li>Fake Rs 500 notes now account for 61.8% of all counterfeit currency detected in banking, up sharply from 38.5% in FY24 and 54.2% in FY25. The three-year surge is consistent and accelerating.<\/li>\n<li>Commercial banks caught 2,24,334 pieces (97.6% of total) in FY26, the highest share in at least six years, driven by mandatory machine-based verification under the RBI&#8217;s Master Direction on Counterfeit Notes issued April 1, 2025.<\/li>\n<li>RBI&#8217;s own detection fell to just 5,412 pieces (2.4%), down from 4.7% in FY25 and 7.9% in FY24, fewer fakes now survive the commercial banking filter before reaching the central bank.<\/li>\n<li>Rs 2,000 counterfeit detections collapsed 76.5% to 824 pieces, a direct consequence of the RBI withdrawing Rs 2,000 notes from active circulation. Counterfeiters have rationally pivoted.<\/li>\n<li>Fake Rs 10, Rs 50, Rs 100, and Rs 200 notes all declined year-on-year. The entire counterfeit problem is concentrating in Rs 500.<\/li>\n<li>Fake Rs 20 notes spiked 47.4% to 373 pieces, statistically notable but negligible in absolute terms.<\/li>\n<li>The Rs 500 note represents 85.5% of total currency value in circulation and 41.2% of volume, with 705.48 crore notes outstanding, making it the single most attractive counterfeiting target by a large margin.<\/li>\n<li>New and upgraded security features for banknotes are planned under RBI&#8217;s Project Sa-Mudra, part of the Utkarsh 2029 framework (April 2026\u2013March 2029). No denomination-specific timeline has been publicly disclosed.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 class=\"section-head\">The 3-year Rs 500 counterfeiting trajectory<\/h2>\n<p class=\"body-text\">The concentration of fake currency in the Rs 500 denomination has risen every single year since FY24, not just in absolute numbers but as a share of total detections. That&#8217;s the number that matters. A rising share in a system where total detections also rose means counterfeiters aren&#8217;t spreading across denominations. They&#8217;re doubling down on one note.<\/p>\n<div class=\"bar-chart\">\n<div class=\"bar-row\">\n<div class=\"bar-label\">\n<table style=\"height: 136px;\" width=\"723\">\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Financial Year<\/th>\n<th>Share of Total Fake Notes<\/th>\n<th>Fake \u20b9500 Notes Detected<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>FY24<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>38.5%<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>85,711 pcs<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>FY25<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>54.2%<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>1,17,622 pcs<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>FY26<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>61.8%<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>1,41,907 pcs<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"body-text\">Rs 500 fake notes as % of all counterfeits detected in banking system \u00b7 RBI Annual Reports FY24, FY25, FY26<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"section-head\">Denomination-by-denomination breakdown \u2014 FY26<\/h2>\n<div class=\"data-table-wrap\">\n<table style=\"height: 281px;\" width=\"725\">\n<colgroup>\n<col \/>\n<col \/>\n<col \/>\n<col \/>\n<col \/><\/colgroup>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Denomination<\/th>\n<th>FY26 (pieces)<\/th>\n<th>FY25 (pieces)<\/th>\n<th>Change<\/th>\n<th>Trend<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"highlight-row\">\n<td><strong>Rs 500<\/strong><\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">1,41,907<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">1,17,622<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\"><span class=\"badge badge-up\">\u2191 20.5%<\/span><\/td>\n<td>Rising sharply<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Rs 2,000<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">824<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">3,508<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\"><span class=\"badge badge-down\">\u2193 76.5%<\/span><\/td>\n<td>Near extinction<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Rs 200<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">\u2014<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">32,660<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\"><span class=\"badge badge-down\">\u2193 Declined<\/span><\/td>\n<td>Falling<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Rs 100<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">\u2014<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">51,069<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\"><span class=\"badge badge-down\">\u2193 Declined<\/span><\/td>\n<td>Falling<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Rs 50<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">\u2014<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">\u2014<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\"><span class=\"badge badge-down\">\u2193 Declined<\/span><\/td>\n<td>Falling<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Rs 20<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">373<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">~253<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\"><span class=\"badge badge-up\">\u2191 47.4%<\/span><\/td>\n<td>Small absolute vol.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Rs 10<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">\u2014<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">\u2014<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\"><span class=\"badge badge-down\">\u2193 Declined<\/span><\/td>\n<td>Falling<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Total all<\/strong><\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\"><strong>2,29,746<\/strong><\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\"><strong>2,17,396<\/strong><\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\"><span class=\"badge badge-up\">\u2191 5.7%<\/span><\/td>\n<td>Rising<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"body-text\">FY26 denomination-level breakdowns for Rs 10\u2013Rs 200 pending full RBI Annual Report 2025-26 table publication. Directional trend confirmed in report summary.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"section-head\">Historical context: 6-year Rs 500 counterfeit trajectory<\/h2>\n<div class=\"data-table-wrap\">\n<table style=\"height: 239px;\" width=\"777\">\n<colgroup>\n<col \/>\n<col \/>\n<col \/>\n<col \/>\n<col \/><\/colgroup>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Year<\/th>\n<th>Total FICNs<\/th>\n<th>Rs 500 fakes<\/th>\n<th>Rs 500 % share<\/th>\n<th>Rs 2,000 fakes<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>FY20<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">2,96,695<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">30,054<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">10.1%<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">17,020<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FY21<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">2,08,625<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">39,453<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">18.9%<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">8,798<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FY22<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">2,30,971<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">79,669<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">34.5%<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">13,604<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FY23<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">2,25,769<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">91,110<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">40.4%<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">9,806<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FY24<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">2,22,639<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">85,711<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">38.5%<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">26,035<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FY25<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">2,17,396<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">1,17,622<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">54.2%<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">3,508<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"highlight-row\">\n<td><strong>FY26<\/strong><\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\"><strong>2,29,746<\/strong><\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\"><strong>1,41,907<\/strong><\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\"><strong>61.8%<\/strong><\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\"><strong>824<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"body-text\">FY20\u2013FY25 data from RBI Annual Reports. FY26 data from the RBI Annual Report 2025-26, released May 29, 2026.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"section-head\">Why Rs 500 is the dominant target<\/h2>\n<div class=\"two-col\">\n<div class=\"insight-box\">\n<div class=\"ib-label\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Metric<\/th>\n<th>FY26 Data<\/th>\n<th>Insight<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Value dominance<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>85.5%<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Share of total currency value in circulation held by \u20b9500 notes<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Volume share<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>41.2%<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Share of all notes in circulation by piece count<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Notes outstanding<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>705.48 crore<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Total \u20b9500 notes in active circulation as of FY26<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Detection rate<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>~2 per lakh<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Approximate fake detection per 1 lakh genuine \u20b9500 notes<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"body-text\">With 705 crore Rs 500 notes in circulation, representing over 85% of all currency value, the denomination moves through kirana stores, vegetable mandis, ATMs and inter-bank transfers every day. The detection rate in absolute terms is low, but the supply-side incentive is enormous. Even a marginal improvement in fake-note production quality translates into large detection numbers at scale.<\/p>\n<div class=\"callout callout-danger\">\n<p><strong>The counterfeiter&#8217;s rational pivot:<\/strong> Fake Rs 2,000 detection fell 76.5% in FY26, from 3,508 to just 824 pieces, tracking directly with the RBI&#8217;s withdrawal of the denomination from circulation. Counterfeiters follow circulating denominations. With Rs 2,000 out and Rs 500 dominant, the concentration was predictable. The question the RBI&#8217;s next security upgrade must answer: can new features hold when 705 crore notes are already in public hands?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"section-head\">Banks are catching more\u2014here&#8217;s why<\/h2>\n<p class=\"body-text\">Commercial banks detected 97.6% of all fake notes in FY26, up from 95.3% in FY25 and 92.1% in FY24. That improvement is not accidental. The RBI issued its Master Direction on Counterfeit Notes on April 1, 2025, mandating all banks to use machine-based verification for every note at teller counters and ATMs, install detection devices, maintain CCTV surveillance, set up dedicated Nodal Officers and Forged Note Vigilance Cells, and file FIRs immediately for large detections.<\/p>\n<div class=\"data-table-wrap\">\n<table style=\"height: 129px;\" width=\"698\">\n<colgroup>\n<col \/>\n<col \/>\n<col \/>\n<col \/><\/colgroup>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Year<\/th>\n<th>Commercial banks<\/th>\n<th>RBI detection<\/th>\n<th>Bank share<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>FY24<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">2,05,026<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">17,613<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">92.1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FY25<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">2,07,141<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">10,255<\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\">95.3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"highlight-row\">\n<td><strong>FY26<\/strong><\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\"><strong>2,24,334<\/strong><\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\"><strong>5,412<\/strong><\/td>\n<td class=\"td-num\"><strong>97.6%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"callout callout-info\">\n<p><strong>Penalty teeth added in 2025:<\/strong> The April 2025 Master Direction created real liability for banks. Failure to impound detected counterfeit notes is treated as wilful involvement in circulation and attracts direct penalty. ATM dispensation of fake notes also draws fines. Non-functional CCTV systems incur Rs 5,000 per incident (Rs 10,000 on repeat). These provisions directly explain the spike in bank-level detection; compliance is no longer optional.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"section-head\">The supply side: cross-border origin of fake currency<\/h2>\n<p class=\"body-text\">The RBI data covers what the banking system intercepts. It does not capture what enters India before reaching a bank. Intelligence and enforcement agencies have documented a structured cross-border supply chain that feeds the FICN problem, primarily originating in Pakistan and routed through Nepal, Bangladesh, Dubai, and other transit points.<\/p>\n<ul class=\"bullet-list\">\n<li>Pakistan-origin fake Indian notes are transported through Nepal&#8217;s porous land border, particularly the Raxaul\u2013Birganj corridor in Bihar, as documented by the NIA and state police in multiple enforcement actions.<\/li>\n<li>In February 2026, a joint Bihar Police and SSB operation in Madhubani arrested Mohammad Abul Inam for allegedly facilitating movement of high-quality Pakistan-printed fake Rs 500 notes smuggled via Nepal.<\/li>\n<li>In March 2026, the NIA found that printing units in Malda, West Bengal, were sourcing material from Pakistan through the Bangladesh border route to produce and distribute fakes locally.<\/li>\n<li>Fake notes from Dubai are transported via air using bonafide passengers as couriers, landing at international airports in Mumbai, Delhi, Chennai, Hyderabad, Bengaluru, and Kochi, per enforcement data.<\/li>\n<li>West Bengal (Malda, Murshidabad, and Nadia) and Bihar border districts remain the primary land-entry points. Nearly 80% of seized counterfeit notes are estimated to enter through these three West Bengal districts, per RBI data cited by enforcement agencies.<\/li>\n<li>Pakistan is also believed to purchase the same European-sourced paper and ink used in India&#8217;s official note printing at the presses in Nashik, Mysuru, and Dewas, enabling near-authentic substrate quality in fakes.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 class=\"section-head\">RBI&#8217;s regulatory and strategic response<\/h2>\n<div class=\"timeline\">\n<div class=\"tl-item\">\n<div class=\"tl-left\">\n<div class=\"tl-year\"><strong>Apr 2025<\/strong><\/div>\n<h3 class=\"tl-line\">Master Direction on Counterfeit Notes 2025 issued<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"tl-content\">\n<div class=\"tl-text\">Mandated machine verification at all teller counters and ATMs, Forged Note Vigilance Cells, immediate FIR filing for large detections, and penalties for non-compliance. Directly drove the FY26 improvement in commercial bank detection rates.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"tl-item\">\n<div class=\"tl-left\">\n<div class=\"tl-dot\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"tl-year\"><strong>Apr 2026<\/strong><\/div>\n<h3 class=\"tl-line\">Utkarsh 2029 framework launched (April 2026\u2013March 2029)<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"tl-content\">\n<div class=\"tl-text\">RBI&#8217;s medium-term strategy includes Project Sa-Mudra, a dedicated initiative to modernise currency management with automation, digital solutions, and new infrastructure. Banknote security feature upgrades are embedded within this agenda.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"tl-item\">\n<div class=\"tl-left\">\n<div class=\"tl-dot\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"tl-year\"><strong>FY27<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"tl-content\">\n<h3 class=\"tl-title\">New\/upgraded banknote security features planned<\/h3>\n<div class=\"tl-text\">RBI Annual Report 2025-26 confirms security feature upgrades and improved substrate durability as live agenda items for FY2026-27. Specific denominations and timelines not yet publicly disclosed.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"verdict-strip\">\n<p>The historical precedent matters here. After demonetisation in November 2016, the new Rs 500 note design caused a temporary drop in fake detections, from 91,110 in FY23 to 85,711 in FY24, before rebounding sharply in FY25 and FY26. Counterfeiters adapted within roughly two years of each security upgrade in the past. The RBI&#8217;s FY27 upgrade cycle begins with that precedent as its benchmark.<\/p>\n<p>Read Next: <a href=\"https:\/\/niftytrader.in\/markets\/india-ibc-faces-biggest-test-in-10-years\/\" rel=\"noopener\">IBC 10 Years: How India\u2019s Bankruptcy Code Transformed Banking, And Why FY26 Is Its Worst Year Yet<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"section-head\">FAQ<\/h2>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<h3 class=\"faq-q\"><span class=\"faq-q-mark\">Q: <\/span>How many fake Rs 500 notes were detected in FY26, and is this the highest ever?<\/h3>\n<div class=\"faq-a\">1,41,907 pieces were detected in FY26, up 20.5% from 1,17,622 in FY25. As a share of total counterfeits (61.8%), this is the highest proportion recorded in at least seven years of available data. In absolute numbers, it is also the highest on record for the denomination, surpassing the previous high of 1,17,622 set in FY25.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<h3 class=\"faq-q\"><span class=\"faq-q-mark\">Q: <\/span>Are Rs 2,000 notes still being counterfeited?<\/h3>\n<div class=\"faq-a\">Effectively no. Detection collapsed 76.5% to just 824 pieces in FY26, from 3,508 in FY25 and a peak of 26,035 in FY24 when the RBI was actively withdrawing the denomination. RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra confirmed to Parliament&#8217;s Standing Committee on Finance in July 2025 that Rs 2,000 notes are no longer in circulation, though they remain legal tender. The counterfeiting risk has largely dissolved with the note itself.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"faq-item\">\n<h3 class=\"faq-q\"><span class=\"faq-q-mark\">Q: <\/span>What is the RBI doing to stop fake Rs 500 notes, and has it worked before?<\/h3>\n<div class=\"faq-a\">Two actions are live. First, the Master Direction on Counterfeit Notes (April 1, 2025) tightened bank-level detection obligations and created penalty liability; FY26 data shows commercial bank detection rates rising to 97.6% as a direct result. Second, new security feature upgrades are planned under Project Sa-Mudra (Utkarsh 2029 framework, 2026\u20132029). Historical precedent: the 2016 post-demonetisation design update caused a brief dip in Rs 500 counterfeiting (FY24: 85,711, down from FY23&#8217;s 91,110), but fakes rebounded sharply within two years. The Rs 500 note&#8217;s sheer volume in circulation, 705.48 crore outstanding, means any delay in the upgrade cycle compounds the exposure.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"divider\" \/>\n<p class=\"body-text\">Next data trigger: RBI FY27 Q1 currency management update, expected mid-2026, will show whether Project Sa-Mudra security feature rollout timelines have been firmed up.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>India&#8217;s banking system detected 2,29,746 fake notes in FY2025-26\u2014up 5.7% from 2,17,396 in FY25, with fake Rs 500 notes jumping 20.5% to 1,41,907 pieces, their highest-ever share of total counterfeits at 61.8%, according to the Reserve Bank of India&#8217;s annual report released Friday, May 29, 2026. Metric FY26 Data Trend Total fake notes detected 2,29,746 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1362],"tags":[],"ppma_author":[1523],"class_list":["post-26897","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-finance-and-economy-news"]," _eael_post_view_count":0,"authors":[{"term_id":1523,"user_id":11,"is_guest":0,"slug":"nikki","display_name":"Nikki Lodha","avatar_url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ae2e265bd56e0e890c866fbaa55d29846ba20cc5372adf666652268816af117e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","0":null,"1":"","2":"","3":"","4":"","5":"","6":"","7":""}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.niftytrader.in\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26897","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.niftytrader.in\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.niftytrader.in\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.niftytrader.in\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.niftytrader.in\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26897"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.niftytrader.in\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26897\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":26900,"href":"https:\/\/www.niftytrader.in\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26897\/revisions\/26900"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.niftytrader.in\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/26898"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.niftytrader.in\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26897"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.niftytrader.in\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26897"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.niftytrader.in\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26897"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.niftytrader.in\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=26897"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}