{"id":9352,"date":"2025-05-26T13:39:50","date_gmt":"2025-05-26T08:09:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/trending.niftytrader.in\/?p=9352"},"modified":"2025-05-27T13:24:54","modified_gmt":"2025-05-27T07:54:54","slug":"supreme-court-stays-bhushan-power-steel-liquidation-ahead-of-jsw-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.niftytrader.in\/markets\/supreme-court-stays-bhushan-power-steel-liquidation-ahead-of-jsw-review\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Stays Bhushan Power &#038; Steel Liquidation Ahead of JSW Review"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2 data-start=\"368\" data-end=\"447\">Status Quo Ordered by Apex Court Amid Legal Uncertainty in BPSL Liquidation<\/h2>\n<p data-start=\"449\" data-end=\"1303\">In a significant development surrounding the insolvency proceedings of Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd (BPSL), the Supreme Court of India has directed that <strong data-start=\"601\" data-end=\"629\">status quo be maintained<\/strong> regarding the company\u2019s liquidation, following the indication from JSW Steel that it intends to file a review petition. The order came days after BPSL&#8217;s former promoter, Sanjay Singhal, approached the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) seeking liquidation based on the Supreme Court&#8217;s judgment dated May 2, 2025. Live Law reported that the apex court has withheld any liquidation actions until it can review JSW Steel\u2019s legal challenge to the ruling, underscoring that status quo is essential &#8220;in the interest of justice.&#8221; According to Bar &amp; Bench, the top court\u2019s observation confirms that no coercive steps should be taken until the review petition is duly disposed of.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"1305\" data-end=\"1320\"><strong data-start=\"1305\" data-end=\"1320\">Highlights:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul data-start=\"1321\" data-end=\"1630\">\n<li data-start=\"1321\" data-end=\"1399\">\n<p data-start=\"1323\" data-end=\"1399\">Supreme Court halts liquidation process of BPSL, citing need for status quo.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li data-start=\"1400\" data-end=\"1470\">\n<p data-start=\"1402\" data-end=\"1470\">JSW Steel plans to file a review petition challenging May 2 verdict.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li data-start=\"1471\" data-end=\"1555\">\n<p data-start=\"1473\" data-end=\"1555\">Former promoter Sanjay Singhal had initiated liquidation proceedings through NCLT.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li data-start=\"1556\" data-end=\"1630\">\n<p data-start=\"1558\" data-end=\"1630\">Review petitions under SC rules must be filed within 30 days of verdict.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 data-start=\"1632\" data-end=\"1715\">Background: JSW Steel\u2019s Rs 20,000 Crore Acquisition of BPSL Under IBC Framework<\/h2>\n<p data-start=\"1717\" data-end=\"2528\">The legal conflict follows years of strategic efforts by JSW Steel to acquire Bhushan Power and Steel under the framework of India\u2019s Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). In September 2019, JSW Steel\u2019s resolution plan, valued at just under Rs 20,000 crore, received approval from the NCLT, paving the way for the formal acquisition. The transaction faced multiple delays due to pending litigation and regulatory clearances, and the acquisition was ultimately completed in March 2021. Since then, BPSL has been integrated into JSW Steel\u2019s operational structure, with the unit contributing to both production and earnings. The May 2 Supreme Court ruling unexpectedly disrupted this stability, as it raised questions over the legitimacy of the asset transfer and opened the door to renewed liquidation proceedings.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"2530\" data-end=\"2545\"><strong data-start=\"2530\" data-end=\"2545\">Highlights:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul data-start=\"2546\" data-end=\"2770\">\n<li data-start=\"2546\" data-end=\"2620\">\n<p data-start=\"2548\" data-end=\"2620\">JSW Steel\u2019s Rs 20,000 crore acquisition of BPSL finalized in March 2021.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li data-start=\"2621\" data-end=\"2682\">\n<p data-start=\"2623\" data-end=\"2682\">Resolution approved by NCLT under IBC after lengthy delays.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li data-start=\"2683\" data-end=\"2770\">\n<p data-start=\"2685\" data-end=\"2770\">Supreme Court\u2019s May 2 ruling introduced legal uncertainty over completed acquisition.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 data-start=\"2772\" data-end=\"2859\">JSW Steel\u2019s Review Bid Seeks to Safeguard BPSL\u2019s Corporate Integrity and Operations<\/h2>\n<p data-start=\"2861\" data-end=\"3582\">JSW Steel is preparing a formal review petition to contest the implications of the Supreme Court\u2019s earlier judgment that enabled Sanjay Singhal to pursue liquidation. The move is seen as a critical step by JSW to protect its operational control and corporate investment in BPSL. The legal ambiguity has cast a shadow over one of India\u2019s landmark IBC-driven takeovers, raising broader concerns about the sanctity of approved resolution plans and finality of judicial decisions in insolvency cases. Legal experts suggest that the apex court\u2019s willingness to consider a review reflects the complexities involved in balancing the interests of past promoters, resolution applicants, and judicial oversight in high-value cases.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"3584\" data-end=\"3599\"><strong data-start=\"3584\" data-end=\"3599\">Highlights:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul data-start=\"3600\" data-end=\"3855\">\n<li data-start=\"3600\" data-end=\"3680\">\n<p data-start=\"3602\" data-end=\"3680\">JSW Steel seeks judicial clarity to prevent reversal of completed acquisition.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li data-start=\"3681\" data-end=\"3765\">\n<p data-start=\"3683\" data-end=\"3765\">Legal experts view review petition as crucial to safeguard precedent in IBC cases.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li data-start=\"3766\" data-end=\"3855\">\n<p data-start=\"3768\" data-end=\"3855\">Supreme Court\u2019s intervention indicates high judicial sensitivity to stakeholder impact.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 data-start=\"3857\" data-end=\"3938\">BPSL Reports Strong Operational Performance in March Quarter Amid Legal Cloud<\/h2>\n<p data-start=\"3940\" data-end=\"4717\">Despite the legal headwinds, BPSL delivered a stable financial performance in the March 2025 quarter, highlighting the operational strength of the business under JSW Steel\u2019s management. Crude steel production for the quarter reached <strong data-start=\"4173\" data-end=\"4196\">0.98 million tonnes<\/strong>, while sales volumes came in at <strong data-start=\"4229\" data-end=\"4252\">0.94 million tonnes<\/strong>. The company reported <strong data-start=\"4275\" data-end=\"4293\">Rs 5,635 crore<\/strong> in revenue from operations and an <strong data-start=\"4328\" data-end=\"4364\">operating EBITDA of Rs 570 crore<\/strong>, marking a 5 percent quarter-on-quarter increase. The improvement in EBITDA was driven by higher sales volumes and a moderation in coking coal costs. BPSL also registered a <strong data-start=\"4538\" data-end=\"4573\">profit after tax of Rs 42 crore<\/strong>, reinforcing JSW Steel\u2019s assertion that the entity remains financially healthy and strategically important to its consolidated steel portfolio.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"4719\" data-end=\"4734\"><strong data-start=\"4719\" data-end=\"4734\">Highlights:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul data-start=\"4735\" data-end=\"4983\">\n<li data-start=\"4735\" data-end=\"4820\">\n<p data-start=\"4737\" data-end=\"4820\">Crude steel production at 0.98 million tonnes; sales volume at 0.94 million tonnes.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li data-start=\"4821\" data-end=\"4902\">\n<p data-start=\"4823\" data-end=\"4902\">Operating EBITDA of Rs 570 crore rose 5% sequentially due to lower input costs.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li data-start=\"4903\" data-end=\"4983\">\n<p data-start=\"4905\" data-end=\"4983\">Profit after tax of Rs 42 crore signals operational stability amid litigation.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3 data-start=\"4985\" data-end=\"5055\">JSW Steel Posts 13.54% Rise in Consolidated Net Profit for Q4 FY25<\/h3>\n<p data-start=\"5057\" data-end=\"5679\">At the group level, JSW Steel reported a <strong data-start=\"5098\" data-end=\"5160\">13.54 percent year-on-year rise in consolidated net profit<\/strong>, reaching <strong data-start=\"5171\" data-end=\"5189\">Rs 1,501 crore<\/strong> for the March 2025 quarter. The positive earnings reflect resilient demand, improved operating margins, and efficiency gains across key facilities, including the contribution from BPSL. The company&#8217;s performance also underscores the strategic value of BPSL within JSW\u2019s integrated supply chain. However, analysts remain watchful of the ongoing legal proceedings, as any reversal or impairment of BPSL\u2019s status could affect the group\u2019s long-term capital planning and balance sheet strength.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"5681\" data-end=\"5696\"><strong data-start=\"5681\" data-end=\"5696\">Highlights:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul data-start=\"5697\" data-end=\"5904\">\n<li data-start=\"5697\" data-end=\"5768\">\n<p data-start=\"5699\" data-end=\"5768\">JSW Steel\u2019s Q4FY25 net profit stood at Rs 1,501 crore, up 13.54% YoY.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li data-start=\"5769\" data-end=\"5837\">\n<p data-start=\"5771\" data-end=\"5837\">BPSL operations contributed positively to consolidated financials.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li data-start=\"5838\" data-end=\"5904\">\n<p data-start=\"5840\" data-end=\"5904\">Market remains cautious pending resolution of BPSL legal battle.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Status Quo Ordered by Apex Court Amid Legal Uncertainty in BPSL Liquidation In a significant development surrounding the insolvency proceedings of Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd (BPSL), the Supreme Court of India has directed that status quo be maintained regarding the company\u2019s liquidation, following the indication from JSW Steel that it intends to file a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[615],"tags":[],"ppma_author":[1331],"class_list":{"0":"post-9352","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-stock-market-news"}," _eael_post_view_count":0,"authors":[{"term_id":1331,"user_id":4,"is_guest":0,"slug":"sourabh","display_name":"Sourabh Sharma","avatar_url":{"url":"https:\/\/trending.niftytrader.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Sourabh-Sharma.png","url2x":"https:\/\/trending.niftytrader.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Sourabh-Sharma.png"},"0":null,"1":"","2":"","3":"","4":"","5":"","6":"","7":""}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.niftytrader.in\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9352","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.niftytrader.in\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.niftytrader.in\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.niftytrader.in\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.niftytrader.in\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9352"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.niftytrader.in\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9352\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9355,"href":"https:\/\/www.niftytrader.in\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9352\/revisions\/9355"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.niftytrader.in\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9353"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.niftytrader.in\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9352"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.niftytrader.in\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9352"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.niftytrader.in\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9352"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.niftytrader.in\/markets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=9352"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}