Tariff Dispute Persists Even as India–US Interim Trade Pact Moves Forward
Trade negotiations between India and the United States appear to be entering the final stretch, but a key sticking point continues to hold both sides back—tariffs.
Despite a recent ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States that struck down reciprocal tariffs, differences remain. India is pushing for lower tariff rates, while the US is not keen on reopening previously agreed terms. Still, both sides are continuing discussions, signalling that an interim trade pact is very much on track.
A person familiar with the negotiations said, “Discussions are almost concluded, but the timing of signing the deal could align with the Section 301 outcome.”
Read More : PNB Q4 Results Surprise: Profit Jumps 14% Despite Weak NII — Should Investors Cheer or Worry?

US Tariffs on India (2025 → April 2026)
| Timeline | Your Statement | Actual Reality |
|---|---|---|
| Early 2025 | 26% reciprocal tariff announced | Around 10%–25% tariffs introduced gradually (no standard 26%) |
| April–Aug 2025 | 25% + 25% = 50% total tariff | Combined tariffs reached 50% (peak tension phase) |
| Feb 2026 (Trade Deal) | Tariff reduced to 18% | 18% was proposed, NOT fully implemented due to court ruling |
| Feb 2026 (Court Ruling) | — | US Supreme Court removed earlier tariff regime |
| Feb–April 2026 | 10% global tariff introduced | 10% temporary tariff under Section 122 applied globally |
| Solar Tariffs (2026) | 125% duty on solar modules | 125%+ duty (sector-specific, not general) |
| Future Tariffs | — | Section 301 probe may introduce new tariffs later |
Why the Tariff Issue Still Matters More Than Ever
At the centre of the disagreement is the tariff structure. India believes that after the US court ruling, the effective tariff rate has already dropped to around 10%, and therefore should be revised lower from the earlier discussed 18%.
However, US officials are cautious. They are waiting for clarity from the ongoing Section 301 probe, which could reshape the tariff framework entirely.
“The current tariff structure may not be final. The Section 301 findings could change the entire equation,” said a trade expert tracking the deal.
This uncertainty is the key reason why both sides are holding back from signing the final agreement, even though negotiations have largely progressed.
Trade Between India and the United States (Latest 2025–2026)
Total Trade Size
- Total goods trade (2025): $149 billion
- India exports to US: $87.3 billion (FY26)
- India imports from US: $52.9 billion (FY26)
India has a trade surplus ($34 billion) with the US
1. India Exports to US
| Sector | Key Products | Importance |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmaceuticals | Generic medicines, APIs | Very high (India supplies ~40% of US generics) |
| Electronics | Electrical equipment, mobile components | Fastest-growing sector |
| Gems & Jewellery | Diamonds, precious stones | Major export category |
| Textiles & Apparel | Garments, fabrics | Labour-intensive exports |
| Engineering Goods | Machinery, auto parts | Strong industrial exports |
| Chemicals | Organic chemicals, agrochemicals | High-value exports |
| Marine & Agriculture | Seafood, spices, rice | Niche but important |
2. India Imports from US
| Sector | Key Products | Importance |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | Crude oil, LNG | Largest import category |
| Aviation | Aircraft, parts | High-value imports |
| Machinery | Industrial equipment | Supports manufacturing |
| Chemicals | Specialty chemicals | Industrial use |
| Precious Metals | Gold, stones | Trade & jewellery sector |
| Agriculture | Almonds, fruits | Consumer demand |
3. Services Trade
| Sector | Key Services | Role |
|---|---|---|
| IT & Software | Outsourcing, cloud, tech services | Largest contributor |
| Business Services | Consulting, finance | High-value exports |
| Education | Student services | Growing segment |
| BPO/KPO | Call centers, analytics | Strong export sector |
India–US Trade Growth
- Trade increased strongly over the years
- $119B (2023) → $129B (2024) → $149B (2025)
- 2025 saw the highest growth (15–16%)
- Driven by exports from India and energy trade
- India’s exports to the US are rising
- $86.5B (FY25) → $87.3B (FY26)
- Imports from the US are growing faster
- $45.6B → $52.9B (FY26)
- India still has a trade surplus
- But surplus reduced due to higher imports
- Overall trend: consistent growth
- Trade continues to expand despite tariff tensions
- Services (IT, software) are major growth drivers
- Strong demand from US companies
- Energy trade boosted growth
- US oil & LNG exports to India increased
- Some short-term slowdown seen in 2026
- Due to tariffs and global issues
- Example: exports to US declined in some months
- US remains India’s #1 export market
- Key driver of India’s global trade
Section 301 Probe Emerges as the Real Deciding Factor
The Section 301 investigation—conducted under the Trade Act of 1974—has become a crucial variable in the negotiations. It allows the US to examine and respond to what it considers unfair trade practices.
The probe, launched on March 12, covers 16 major economies including India, China, Japan, South Korea and the European Union. It spans critical sectors such as:
- Steel and aluminium
- Automobiles and batteries
- Electronics and semiconductors
- Chemicals and machinery
- Solar modules
Depending on its findings, the US could impose new tariffs or revise existing ones, which would directly impact the structure of any trade deal with India.
From Courtroom to Policy Shift: How the US Changed Its Approach
The turning point came when the US Supreme Court struck down the earlier reciprocal tariff regime. This forced Washington to look for alternative tools to maintain trade pressure.
In the interim, the US has relied on Section 122, which allows temporary tariffs—currently set at around 10%. However, this mechanism is limited in scope and duration.
That’s why the focus has now shifted to Section 301, which offers a more flexible and long-term policy route.
“Section 122 is a stop-gap. Section 301 is where the real policy direction will come from,” noted a policy analyst.
Negotiations Progress, But Timing Remains Uncertain
The last round of in-person talks, held between April 20 and 23, helped narrow several differences. However, tariff-related issues remain unresolved.
Both sides appear to be adopting a wait-and-watch approach. While discussions continue in parallel, the final signing of the agreement may depend on when the Section 301 probe concludes.
This creates a situation where the deal is ready in principle—but not yet ready in timing.
Here’s What Happened Today and Why Traders Reacted
Markets responded cautiously to the developments around the India–US trade talks.
- Progress in negotiations supported positive sentiment
- Continued tariff disagreement added uncertainty
- Section 301 probe created a wait-and-watch mood
- Lack of final deal timeline limited strong market moves
For traders, the key takeaway was simple: progress is real, but clarity is still missing.
Impact on Markets and Investor Portfolios
The ongoing developments have broader implications for multiple sectors, especially export-driven industries.
Positive Signals for Investors
- Trade deal nearing completion boosts long-term outlook
- Potential tariff reductions could improve export competitiveness
- Stronger India–US ties may benefit sectors like IT, pharma, and manufacturing
Key Risks to Watch
- Delay in final agreement could keep markets volatile
- Section 301 outcome may introduce new tariffs
- Policy uncertainty could impact short-term investment decisions
Export-oriented stocks, in particular, may remain sensitive to updates around tariff changes and final deal timelines.
The Bigger Picture: A Deal Within Reach, But Not Without Conditions
The India–US trade deal is closer than it has been in months. Negotiations have progressed, and both sides appear committed to reaching an agreement.
However, tariffs remain the final hurdle—and a significant one.
India wants a better deal. The US wants flexibility. And both are waiting for clarity from an ongoing investigation that could redefine the terms altogether.
As one official involved in the discussions put it, “The deal is not stuck—it’s just waiting for the right moment.”
For now, that moment depends on what comes out of the Section 301 probe.
