ICRA: Private Banks Face Steeper NPA Rise Than PSBs in FY27

ICRA: Private Banks Face Steeper NPA Rise Than PSBs in FY27
ICRA: Private Banks Face Steeper NPA Rise Than PSBs in FY27
Author-
11 Min Read

Rating agency cites unsecured retail and MSME exposure as structural fault line; Crisil separately warns system-wide GNPAs could touch 2.5% by March 2027

Date: April 23, 2026


Private sector banks will see a sharper rise in bad loans than state-owned peers in FY27, rating agency ICRA said in a press release on April 22, 2026, projecting system-wide gross non-performing advances (GNPAs) at 2.0–2.1% for the year ending March 2027, a slight uptick from current levels, with the deterioration concentrated in private bank portfolios.

The divergence is structural. Private banks carry heavier exposure to unsecured retail loans and MSME credit segments under active stress, while public sector banks (PSBs) are shielded by a higher share of collateral-backed corporate and priority sector lending. ICRA Vice President and Sector Head Sachin Sachdeva said private banks “continue to report higher slippage rates than public sector banks owing to their greater exposure to unsecured retail and MSME portfolios.” ICRA had already projected private bank fresh NPA generation at 2.2% for FY25, up from 2.0% in FY24, establishing the baseline from which any FY27 deterioration should be measured.

The scale of that exposure is documented in RBI data: unsecured products accounted for 76% of private bank slippages in FY25, compared with just 15.9% for PSBs, according to the RBI Financial Stability Report 2025. That gap is the central reason private banks will bear a disproportionate share of any deterioration in FY27.

Quarterly data shows the divergence is already playing out

The trend is not a forecast in isolation; it showed up in hard numbers in Q1FY26. Slippages across 30 lenders tracked by CareEdge Ratings rose 26% year-on-year to ₹63,000 crore in the June 2025 quarter, driven by stress in microfinance and unsecured retail. Private bank slippages jumped 41% to ₹36,000 crore, while PSB slippages rose a more contained 14.4% to ₹27,000 crore in the same period.

IndusInd Bank is the clearest case study in the sector. The lender reported a 91% year-on-year collapse in net profit to ₹128 crore in Q3FY26, hit by elevated slippages in commercial vehicles and microfinance, with credit costs running at 2.6%. The bank’s new management has guided for a return on assets of 1% on an exit basis over the next 12–18 months, a target analysts describe as dependent on a meaningful decline in fresh slippages.

By contrast, HDFC Bank and ICICI Bank reported strong Q4FY26 results on April 18, 2026. ICICI Bank posted a GNPA of 1.40%, a record low with provisions collapsing to ₹96 crore, down 89% year-on-year. HDFC Bank reported PAT of ₹19,221 crore (+9.1% YoY) with a stable gross NPA below 1.42%. The divergence within private banking itself is significant: the sector’s NPA problem in FY27 is concentrated in mid-tier lenders with heavy microfinance and unsecured personal loan books, not at the top-two franchises.

West Asian conflict introduces a new macro risk

ICRA’s FY27 outlook is framed against the West Asia conflict, which has disrupted the Strait of Hormuz since late February 2026. With West Asia accounting for 14–20% of India’s trade, higher oil prices risk widening the current account deficit, fuelling inflation, weakening household income, and increasing defaults in consumer credit, the segment where private banks are most exposed.

ICRA projects India’s real GDP growth at 6.5% in FY27, assuming crude at an average of $85 per barrel. Credit growth is forecast to moderate to 11.0–11.7% from 15.9% in FY26, with total outstanding non-food bank credit projected at ₹236.4–237.9 trillion. MSME borrowers face the most direct risk from supply chain disruptions, Sachdeva said, noting that banks may turn cautious toward a segment that was “one of the key growth drivers in the recent past.”

Crisil separately warned that GNPAs, which have bottomed out, could rise by up to 20 basis points to 2.5% by March 2027. Crisil’s chief rating officer, Krishnan Sitaraman, flagged MSME loans, particularly those exposed to West Asia through exports or raw materials, as a key monitorable item. Crisil also identified sectors including ceramics and diamond polishing as already showing stress. Two domestic risks add to the picture: Bihar’s proposed microfinance legislation and Maharashtra’s loan waiver scheme, both of which could affect credit discipline at the ground level.

Profitability pressure is quantified, not catastrophic

ICRA put numbers on the earnings impact. Every 50 basis point increase in the fresh NPA generation rate reduces return on average assets (RoA) by 9–10 basis points and return on equity (RoE) by 95–100 basis points. The agency projects RoA and RoE at 1.2–1.3% and 12.3–13.2%, respectively, for FY27, a slight decline but sufficient to internally fund credit growth without fresh capital raises for most lenders.

Net interest margins will remain under pressure. Banks drew down surplus liquidity buffers in FY26, including excess statutory liquidity ratio (SLR) holdings, to support credit expansion, reducing liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) buffers heading into FY27. Deposit mobilisation at competitive rates remains a challenge, and the cost of deposits is not expected to ease materially in the near term.

PSBs enter FY27 with a decade of reforms behind them

Public sector banks enter FY27 in the strongest structural position in a decade. The PSB slippage ratio fell from 8.35% in March 2018 to 0.81% in September 2025, per RBI data published by the Ministry of Finance. The GNPA ratio for PSBs stood at 3.12% in September 2024, down from a peak of 14.58% in March 2018, a turnaround driven by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), SARFAESI-based recoveries, and the government’s 4R strategy of recognition, resolution, recapitalisation, and reform.

PSBs recorded their highest-ever aggregate net profit of ₹1.41 lakh crore in FY24, up from ₹1.05 lakh crore in FY23. Their capital adequacy ratio improved to 15.43% in September 2024, up 393 basis points from March 2015, according to PIB data.

Overall sector outlook: Stable, but watch the tail risks

ICRA maintained a stable outlook on the Indian banking sector for FY27, citing comfortable capitalisation, manageable asset quality risks, and steady profitability. The agency does not expect system-wide GNPAs to breach 2.1% in its base case. The risk scenario, flagged explicitly, is a prolonged West Asia conflict that pushes crude materially above $85/barrel, sustains inflation, and drives slippage rates higher than the current projection. In that scenario, private banks with large microfinance and unsecured consumer books face the sharpest earnings downgrade risk.

The Nifty Bank index has already corrected 16% from February 28, 2026, the date the West Asia conflict escalated, to March 30, 2026, reflecting market concern about exactly this risk. The Q4FY26 results from HDFC Bank and ICICI Bank have partially restored confidence, but IndusInd Bank’s recovery trajectory and sector-wide MSME slippage rates are the two variables that will determine whether ICRA’s 2.0–2.1% base case holds.

Also Read: Jio Financial, Allianz Sign 50:50 Insurance JV; Trent PAT Up 33%

FAQs

Why will private banks see higher NPA growth than public sector banks in FY27?

Private banks expanded aggressively into unsecured retail credit, personal loans, credit cards, and microfinance over FY22–FY25. RBI data shows unsecured products accounted for 76% of private bank slippages in FY25, versus 15.9% for PSBs. These portfolios are most vulnerable to income shocks from higher oil prices and MSME supply chain disruptions stemming from the West Asia conflict.

What is the system-wide GNPA forecast for FY27?

ICRA projects system-wide GNPAs at 2.0-2.1% in FY27 (April 22, 2026, press release). Crisil’s separate forecast warns GNPAs could rise by up to 20 basis points to 2.5% by March 2027, depending on how long the West Asia conflict persists.

Which private banks are most at risk of NPA stress in FY27?

Banks with the highest share of microfinance, unsecured personal loans, and MSME credit in their loan books carry the most exposure. IndusInd Bank has already reported severe stress; net profit fell 91% in Q3FY26. HDFC Bank and ICICI Bank, with GNPAs at 1.42% and a record-low 1.40%, respectively, as of Q4FY26, are better positioned but not immune to MSME slippages.

Will rising NPAs hurt bank profitability significantly in FY27?

ICRA estimates every 50 basis point increase in the fresh NPA generation rate reduces RoA by 9–10 bps and RoE by 95–100 bps. The agency projects sector RoA at 1.2–1.3% and RoE at 12.3–13.2% for FY27, a slight decline but not a crisis level.

What additional domestic risks could worsen private bank NPA outcomes in FY27?

Beyond the West Asia macro risk, Crisil flagged two India-specific concerns: Bihar’s proposed microfinance legislation, which could affect lending conditions in the state, and Maharashtra’s loan waiver scheme, which could weaken credit repayment discipline in a key banking market.

What is the RBI’s current stance on unsecured lending risk?

The RBI raised risk weights on unsecured personal loans and credit cards in November 2023, making this lending more capital-intensive. If system-wide slippage rates rise materially beyond ICRA’s 2.0–2.1% GNPA projection, the RBI’s Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) framework could restrict lending at weaker lenders.

Share This Article
Go to Top
Join our WhatsApp channel
Subscribe to our YouTube channel