Key Takeaways
- Sebi has closed the securities-law track of the NSEL matter for 91 commodity brokers, but criminal probes by the EOW and ED and the investor-recovery process continue untouched on separate tracks.
- Settlement amounts vary sharply: most entities paid close to Rs 6 lakh, while Pace Commodity Brokers (Rs 36.05 lakh) and Emkay Commotrade (Rs 30.84 lakh) paid the most.
- Several brokers accepted a voluntary six-month or one-month exit from proprietary trading and new client onboarding in the commodity segment; some settled with no such curb.
- The scheme excluded any broker named in an EOW/ED/MCA/SFIO charge sheet or declared a defaulter by an exchange, which is why 91 is a fraction of the brokers Sebi has pursued since 2016.
- This runs on a separate track from the Rs 1,950-crore investor payout the NCLT approved in November 2025.
A 13-Year-Old Case Gets a Partial Close
Sebi has settled proceedings against 91 commodity brokers connected to the 2013 National Spot Exchange Ltd (NSEL) payment crisis, under a settlement order dated September 9, 2026.
But the order closes only one track of a case that has run since 2013: the criminal investigations pursued separately by the Economic Offences Wing and Enforcement Directorate are unaffected, and so is the investor-side recovery process now running through the NCLT.
Anyone reading this as “NSEL is resolved” would be reading it wrong; this is Sebi clearing its own securities-law docket, not a final word on the broader saga.
Check Live: NiftyTrader: Live Options Analytics & F&O Trading Tools
What Sebi’s Order Says
The order confirms that all 91 applicants under the NSEL Settlement Scheme, 2025, completed their required payments within the scheme’s window, which ran from August 25, 2025, to February 25, 2026.
Named entities include Religare Commodities, SMC Comtrade, Jainam Commodities, and Adroit Commodities Services, among the more recognisable names in a list of 91.
Why the Settlement Amounts Vary So Widely
Most brokers paid close to Rs 6 lakh each. Two stood apart: Pace Commodity Brokers paid Rs 36.05 lakh, the highest in the batch, and Emkay Commotrade paid Rs 30.84 lakh.
The gap reflects how the scheme calculates the monetary component, per broker, based on the units and traded value involved in that broker’s “paired contracts” on NSEL, rather than a flat fee.
Non-monetary terms varied too: some brokers accepted a six-month voluntary debarment from proprietary trading and new client onboarding in the commodity segment, some accepted only one month, and others settled with no debarment at all, depending on what the original orders under challenge had directed.
📊 Track institutional activity alongside regulatory news: For daily FII/DII flow data as Sebi works through its legacy enforcement backlog, check the NiftyTrader FII-DII Tracker.
Why the NSEL Case Is Still Not Over
The latest SEBI settlement does not eliminate the wider NSEL legacy. The settlement framework itself distinguishes the securities-law proceedings covered by the scheme from matters being investigated by other law-enforcement agencies.
That leaves an important uncertainty around the broader case: the settlement closes proceedings for the brokers covered by this particular mechanism, but it does not mean every legal, criminal or recovery-related issue connected with the 2013 crisis has reached the same endpoint.
For investors and market participants, the key takeaway is therefore not simply that “91 brokers settled”. It is that one major regulatory track has moved closer to closure while other parts of the long-running NSEL matter remain separate.
Why Only 91, and Not Every NSEL Broker
The scheme, run under Section 15JB of the SEBI Act, 1992, and Regulation 26 of the SEBI (Settlement Proceedings) Regulations, 2018, was open only to brokers who had already appealed a Sebi order to SAT or the courts, and it carried a non-refundable Rs 29,500 application fee.
Two exclusions kept the eligible pool narrow: brokers named in an EOW, ED, MCA, or SFIO charge sheet were shut out entirely, and so were brokers already declared defaulters by the exchanges.
Sebi also built in a trapdoor, if any of the 91 is charge-sheeted in the NSEL matter later, that broker’s settlement is automatically voided.
That’s why 91 is a meaningful number but a partial one: Sebi’s NSEL enforcement, going back to show-cause notices first issued in 2016, has touched a much larger set of brokers than the ones who ultimately qualified for this window.
The Rs 5,600-Crore Backdrop
The crisis dates to July 2013, when payment defaults at NSEL left roughly 13,000 traders exposed to an estimated Rs 5,600 crore in unresolved obligations.
NSEL was promoted by Jignesh Shah-led Financial Technologies (India) Ltd, since renamed 63 Moons Technologies, which also founded the Multi Commodity Exchange (MCX).
The Investor Side Hasn’t Waited for This Order
Separately from Sebi’s broker settlements, the Mumbai bench of the NCLT approved a Rs 1,950-crore one-time settlement in late November 2025, covering 5,682 NSEL traders and backed financially by 63 Moons Technologies.
That process addresses what investors are owed; this week’s Sebi order addresses broker-level regulatory violations.
The two are legally and financially independent, even though both trace back to the same 2013 default, worth keeping straight if you’re citing this alongside 63 Moons’ stock moves, since this settlement doesn’t touch that company directly.
Sebi’s Broader Settlement Playbook
This is Sebi’s second high-profile use of the settlement route in recent months. In July-August 2026, its in-principle Rs 1,491.21-crore settlement with the National Stock Exchange over the co-location and dark-fibre cases helped clear a legacy overhang as NSE’s IPO moved through review; NiftyTrader tracked that settlement here.
Read together, the two settlements point to Sebi increasingly favouring settlement orders over prolonged tribunal battles to close its oldest enforcement matters.
Also Read: NSE IPO Shrinks Before Launch: ₹22,561 Crore Offer, Key Changes
Bottom Line
Sebi has closed one chapter of a 13-year-old case, not the book. The scheme deliberately excluded brokers facing criminal charge sheets, and it runs independently of the investor payout already cleared by the NCLT.
For now, the story is also competing for reader attention against a heavier macro narrative; Indian equities just logged a fifth straight weekly decline on oil trading near $110 a barrel, so treat this as a solid regulatory-desk story rather than a high-reach one, and let the headline’s “13 years” framing do the work of pulling in readers who’d otherwise scroll past a routine settlement bulletin.
Read Next: EU-India FTA Moves Closer to Signing: 7 Indian Sectors in Focus
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. NiftyTrader.in is a Sebi-registered platform and does not recommend buying, selling, or holding any security. Readers should verify details from official Sebi orders and exchange filings and consult a registered financial advisor before making investment decisions.
